Quality Management

Keep quality actions connected to the work that resolves them.

Follow the finding, the action and the evidence your reviewer needs, with the responsible teams working in one platform.

Built for quality leads and cross-functional teams coordinating investigations, changes and effectiveness reviews.

Interactive sample · no signup · fictional records

See the work in Azora

Before a requirement changes, see what needs review.

Actual Impact Analysis example linking requirement REQ-101 to design documents, two test cases and a risk

Scroll the interface sideways to inspect the detail.

  1. Start with the requirement

    Open the requirement behind the proposed change.

  2. Follow its evidence

    Inspect the linked design records, test cases and risk.

  3. Plan the review

    Bring the relevant evidence into the change discussion.

Actual Azora interface · fictional sample data. Open full-size image (opens in a new tab)
One platformShared operational data
Role-awareAccess follows responsibility
ConnectedContext follows the record

For a better-informed review

The next quality decision, with evidence in view.

Keep the action owner, recorded findings and effectiveness evidence in context. Give your team a place to return to what was done and what the evidence shows.

Colleagues considering work together at a laptop

Context for every handoff

Keep the response connected to the reason.

Help each person understand the source, the action they own and what the next reviewer needs to see.

  1. 01

    For the quality lead

    Follow the source record, investigation, owner and due date as the response takes shape.

  2. 02

    For the action owner

    Work with the relevant project actions, controlled changes and supporting records.

  3. 03

    For the reviewer

    Inspect the investigation and effectiveness evidence against your approved procedure.

One connected quality story

From a finding to a considered decision.

Follow one quality event through the people who investigate, act and review. Keep the original context in view as the work changes hands.

  1. 01Quality lead

    Capture the finding

    Record the nonconformance, complaint or audit finding and the facts that explain it.

    At the handoffThe investigator gets a clear starting record.

  2. 02Investigator

    Define the response

    Record the investigation, disposition and corrective action with an owner and due date.

    At the handoffThe action owner gets a defined response to carry out.

  3. 03Action owner

    Coordinate the change

    Review related project actions, controlled documents and training needs with the affected teams.

    At the handoffThe reviewer gets the supporting work and its context.

  4. 04Reviewer

    Evaluate the result

    Inspect effectiveness evidence and verification history before deciding whether closure is appropriate.

    At the handoffThe decision stays grounded in the record and your procedure.

The tools supporting your quality process

CAPA and nonconformance

Record the issue, disposition, investigation and corrective action. Keep the responsible owner, due date and effectiveness review visible.

Controlled documents and signing

Manage numbered documents, revisions, review routes and signing ceremonies. Keep approved content, review dates and controlled-copy records in view.

Design and test traceability

Link requirements, design records and tests in the Design Controls hub. Inspect the relationships and missing evidence before a review.

Training records

Review required-course coverage alongside employee completions. Find current, expired and missing training in the matrix.

Audits and supplier findings

Plan audits, assign findings and follow their resolution. Keep supplier quality records alongside the vendors Operations works with.

Quality oversight

Use quality, risk and post-market registers to prioritize follow-up. Review overdue actions and open issues with the teams that own them.

Bring this to your walkthrough

Let’s follow the evidence your reviewer needs.

A redacted CAPA or NCR and your review procedure make a useful starting point. Together, follow the records and identify configuration and validation work.

SourceCan you follow the original issue and related records?
OwnerIs the next action and responsible person clear?
EvidenceWhat must be reviewed before this record closes?

Connected by design

Connect Quality Management to the wider team.

Project, quality, Operations, HR and controlled-document solutions are included in one platform plan. Evaluate the records, roles and handoffs your team needs to bring together.

01

Engineering actions

Coordinate investigations, changes and tests with the people doing the work.

02

People and documents

Review controlled-document changes and affected training requirements together.

03

Supplier context

Keep supplier findings and related vendor information in the same platform.

Your quality process

Bring the finding. Follow the response.

Explore the sample quality story, or request a walkthrough around your own investigation, handoffs and review needs.

Browse all nine solutions →