Engineering & R&D

Design controls that maintain themselves.

Design reviews, test management, risk, traceability, dependencies, releases, and CI/CD — the ISO 13485 §7.3 workload, generated from the engineering work you're already doing.

Built for R&D teams who own design controls and are done maintaining them by hand.

Read-only demo · no signup · sample data only

Traceability graph linking requirements to specs to tests to releases
Actual product interface · sample data
One platformShared operational data
Role-awareAccess follows responsibility
ConnectedContext follows the record

The problem

Design controls are real engineering work, buried under paperwork.

The §7.3 deliverables are treated as documents to assemble at review time instead of a byproduct of the work itself.

  1. 01

    The trace matrix is a second job

    Every requirement→spec→test→release link is re-typed into a spreadsheet that's stale before the review even starts.

  2. 02

    Risk lives apart from the design

    Your ISO 14971 analysis is a document; the design it's meant to govern is somewhere else entirely.

  3. 03

    Nobody can see the real seams

    Which R&D sub-team blocks which? The interface contracts and dependencies are tribal knowledge, not a map.

How Azora solves it

Stop maintaining the matrix. Generate it.

Design controls, risk, and releases share one graph — the evidence accumulates as engineers do the work, not at review time.

  1. 01

    Design Controls hub

    Design reviews, test management, and traceability in one hub — the §7.3 chain built from links you make as normal work.

  2. 02

    Risk hub (ISO 14971)

    FMEA and risk register wired to the design controls they govern, not stranded in a separate file.

  3. 03

    Dependencies & interface contracts

    Map the named seams between sub-teams; see what blocks what before it blocks you.

  4. 04

    Releases & change control

    Compose releases from the work that shipped; signed change control keeps the history straight.

  5. 05

    CI/CD & lab

    Pipeline status and lab/equipment management alongside the design record.

  6. 06

    Genealogy & BOM

    Trace a unit to its BOM and its inspection history — engineering and operations share the same graph.

Practitioner perspective

I used to maintain the trace matrix in a spreadsheet — three days a release. Now it's a graph view that builds itself from the link picker. I haven't opened the spreadsheet in two months.
HassanAI/Software Engineer at Azora Optical Solutions · the team that built Azora
0Manual trace-matrix maintenance
§7.3Design controls generated, not typed
1 graphDesign, risk, tests, releases

Connected by design

Engineering & R&D does not become another silo.

Azora keeps project, quality, operations, people, clinical, and customer context on one operational data layer. Teams can follow the record instead of rebuilding its history in the next tool.

01

Capture the source

Keep the originating task, study, customer, unit, or people record attached to the work it creates.

02

Govern the handoff

Route ownership and approvals through role-aware workflows, with controlled history where the record requires it.

03

Read the same signal

Let downstream teams and leadership work from linked operational data instead of reconciling exports.

See the connected workflow

Let the evidence build itself.

The demo tenant seeds requirements, specs, tests, and releases so you can explore the traceability graph immediately.

Browse all nine solutions →