The model's lineage is unprovable
Which dataset trained which model that drove which outcome? If you can't show the chain, an auditor can't accept the result.
Clinical R&D
Clinical studies plus the full regulated eQMS evidence chain — CAPA, audits, design controls, risk, change control — with a dataset→model→outcome lineage registry and a grounded trial copilot for AI-driven work.
Built for teams running AI-driven trials who need audit-ready evidence, not a six-figure eClinical suite.
Read-only demo · no signup · sample data only
The problem
The moment a model touches a trial, you owe a lineage and an evidence chain most AI teams have no way to produce.
Which dataset trained which model that drove which outcome? If you can't show the chain, an auditor can't accept the result.
CAPA, audits, design controls, and risk get assembled at inspection time instead of accumulating as you work.
The validated suites that do this cost more than a startup's entire runway.
How Azora solves it
The clinical study lives beside the same regulated eQMS hubs as full QMS — plus the AI lineage and a copilot grounded in the trial's own data.
The clinical study record plus a study→milestone workspace to run the trial day to day.
Dataset → model → outcome lineage captured as first-class records — the provenance an auditor will ask for.
Grounded Q&A over the trial's own data — answers that cite the record, not the open internet.
CAPA/NCR, audits, design controls, risk, change control, and complaints/vigilance — the same audit-ready hubs as full QMS.
Controlled documents and per-person training records, versioned and review-tracked.
The governance layer and computed insights that keep the study inspection-ready as it runs.
Practitioner perspective
We needed the evidence chain of a validated eQMS with the speed of an AI team. Building the study and the audit trail in the same place is the only way that math works.
Connected by design
Azora keeps project, quality, operations, people, clinical, and customer context on one operational data layer. Teams can follow the record instead of rebuilding its history in the next tool.
Keep the originating task, study, customer, unit, or people record attached to the work it creates.
Route ownership and approvals through role-aware workflows, with controlled history where the record requires it.
Let downstream teams and leadership work from linked operational data instead of reconciling exports.
See the connected workflow
Explore the live demo, or talk to us about a seeded clinical tenant. Trial and demo data are synthetic only.
Browse all nine solutions →