Purchasing can't see the demand
POs are cut in one system; the engineering backlog that needs the parts lives in another. Buying is always a guess or a scramble.
ERP / Operations
Purchasing, vendors, inventory, units, BOMs, manufacturing, and a real general ledger — in the same rows as the projects that drive the demand.
Built for hardware companies that need ERP rigor but can't stomach a six-figure implementation.
Read-only demo · no signup · sample data only
The problem
You're stuck between a six-figure implementation and a fragile pile of spreadsheets that forgets everything the moment the person who built it leaves.
POs are cut in one system; the engineering backlog that needs the parts lives in another. Buying is always a guess or a scramble.
Serial numbers, generations, locations, genealogy — the record of your physical product is a fragile file, not a system.
The GL, the POs, and the project budgets never agree until someone spends two days making them.
How Azora solves it
When a PO funds a sprint, it's one row from that sprint. When a unit ships, its whole genealogy is one click away.
PO workflows with amount-threshold approvals; vendor records with risk, qualification, COI/W9 expiry, and rolling scores.
Serialized units with full history and parent-child genealogy — trace a deployed serial back to its BOM and inspection records.
Parts master, multi-level BOMs, on-hand inventory, and availability — the physical product modeled as data.
Manufacturing and work orders with a status lifecycle and required signoffs.
Chart of accounts, an append-only journal, accounts receivable, and a fixed-assets subledger with depreciation.
The PO that funds Sprint 12 is one row from Sprint 12. No exports, no month-end reconciliation gymnastics.
Practitioner perspective
We replaced a standalone ERP with Azora and gained the cross-module reporting we never had. Purchasing now sees the engineering backlog driving demand — finally.
Connected by design
Azora keeps project, quality, operations, people, clinical, and customer context on one operational data layer. Teams can follow the record instead of rebuilding its history in the next tool.
Keep the originating task, study, customer, unit, or people record attached to the work it creates.
Route ownership and approvals through role-aware workflows, with controlled history where the record requires it.
Let downstream teams and leadership work from linked operational data instead of reconciling exports.
See the connected workflow
The demo tenant seeds vendors, sample POs, and a unit genealogy you can explore end to end.
Browse all nine solutions →